Yoga Food & Travel Rotating Header Image

Example Of Mutual Recognition Agreement

By granting mutual recognition to products covered by free trade agreements with Canada and Korea, but denying the same treatment for products originating in the UK, the EU could be violating WTO law. In the context of the Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA), one country implements conformity assessment procedures in its own territory in accordance with the rules of the other country and the other recognises this procedure as if it had implemented it itself. However, recent free trade agreements indicate a change in approach and acceptance of “traditional” SARs. For example, Articles 4(6) and 7(21)(4) of the EU-Korea Free Trade Agreement provide for the negotiation of mutual recognition of conformity assessment for goods and services. If the EU refuses to negotiate with the UK a similar system of mutual recognition, this may be contrary to the most-favoured-nation (MFN) obligation under World Trade Organisation (WTO) law. The greatest predominance is a non-discrimination rule that requires that any benefit granted to goods originating in one country be granted to like products originating in other countries. EPAs are usually concluded with candidate countries with which the EU has concluded association agreements (see our explanation of association agreements) and are a step in the accession process. The objective of the JEPs is to align the technical rules of a candidate country with those of the EU with a view to preparing for EU membership. This type of MRA is by nature temporary, as it disappears when the country enters the EU`s internal market.

However, European Commission negotiators have recently opposed the mutual recognition of UK testing laboratories deemed to be in compliance. During a transitional period, the authorities shall assess mutually, within the framework of the Agreement, pharmaceutical legislation, guides and regulatory systems. The EU`s internal market is the most comprehensive version of mutual recognition between trading partners. According to the Dijon blackcurrant principle, a product that can be sold legally in one Member State, even if the rules are not harmonised, can legally be sold in any other Member State. These agreements benefit regulators by reducing double inspections in any other area, allowing for greater concentration on sites that may pose a higher risk, and expanding inspection coverage of the global supply chain. . .

Comments are closed.